At least one third of new car customers in America thought of fuel economy an important factor.. Back in 1992 already General Motors built a vehicle that got 100 miles to the gallon - and all these years later on one of people's major concerns on top of global warming and pollution is dependence on foreign oil. Yet another vehicle, the GM TPC, which looked a lot like the Geo Metro, weighed only 1000 pounds and would get 75 miles per gallon. Regrettably, to be able to meet American safety regulations, the 3-cylinder vehicle required reinforcement weighing 200 pounds, which led to further development being discarded.
This was certainly not the only protype designed by GM which ended up on the scrapheap. A number of these were the 1982 GM Lean Machine which made 80 miles per gallon, and the GM Ultralite which did 100 mpg. GM seemed to be offering cars to the buying public in 1992 that did 20 mpg, while Honda was getting 50 mpg with their Civic VX, but right then GM already covertly had cars doing 100 miles per gallon. If cars which were capable of doing 100 miles per gallon had already been developed way back then, why is it that such cars are not being sold today?
How come standard vehicles sold in the US, while at the same time, the same suppliers are selling different vehicles far away in other countries? For many years automobiles that get over 70 miles per gallon have been sold in Japan and Europe. A case in point of a car / truck never sold within the US and capable of 78 mpg, is the Lupo by Volkswagen. Honda launched to the US sector in 2007, a car called the Fit, but known as the Jazz in other parts of the world. The Jazz in Japan has ways to enhance fuel economy and a smaller engine, but for the US, the Fit doesn't even use a smaller engine as an option.
The automobile manufacturers tell Americans that they love big cars, and that is what they want to produce big cars. It is evident that manufacturers don't make a lot of money selling a small 2-person commuter vehicle, but they certainly do selling big SUVs. A Tank on Wheels is the thing to own - that's the concept that the commercials beguile the American public with. It really is quite apparent where the giant companies' interests lay when you consider that they have never offered options. The top in fuel economy may have been General Motors, but they choose to be the leader in SUVs instead. The rest of the auto producers did the same thing by producing fuel-efficient cars, but then denied them to Americans.
We all live in a community that has waged wars over oil, that has been polluted, and car makers have never even given the choice to people in this country of fuel-efficient cars. The question comes up: how many Americans would've welcomed the option of obtaining a car with good gas mileage but weren't ever offered it? Could it be time to retrieve those discarded designs and, again, start building those vehicles that were once built a long time ago?
This was certainly not the only protype designed by GM which ended up on the scrapheap. A number of these were the 1982 GM Lean Machine which made 80 miles per gallon, and the GM Ultralite which did 100 mpg. GM seemed to be offering cars to the buying public in 1992 that did 20 mpg, while Honda was getting 50 mpg with their Civic VX, but right then GM already covertly had cars doing 100 miles per gallon. If cars which were capable of doing 100 miles per gallon had already been developed way back then, why is it that such cars are not being sold today?
How come standard vehicles sold in the US, while at the same time, the same suppliers are selling different vehicles far away in other countries? For many years automobiles that get over 70 miles per gallon have been sold in Japan and Europe. A case in point of a car / truck never sold within the US and capable of 78 mpg, is the Lupo by Volkswagen. Honda launched to the US sector in 2007, a car called the Fit, but known as the Jazz in other parts of the world. The Jazz in Japan has ways to enhance fuel economy and a smaller engine, but for the US, the Fit doesn't even use a smaller engine as an option.
The automobile manufacturers tell Americans that they love big cars, and that is what they want to produce big cars. It is evident that manufacturers don't make a lot of money selling a small 2-person commuter vehicle, but they certainly do selling big SUVs. A Tank on Wheels is the thing to own - that's the concept that the commercials beguile the American public with. It really is quite apparent where the giant companies' interests lay when you consider that they have never offered options. The top in fuel economy may have been General Motors, but they choose to be the leader in SUVs instead. The rest of the auto producers did the same thing by producing fuel-efficient cars, but then denied them to Americans.
We all live in a community that has waged wars over oil, that has been polluted, and car makers have never even given the choice to people in this country of fuel-efficient cars. The question comes up: how many Americans would've welcomed the option of obtaining a car with good gas mileage but weren't ever offered it? Could it be time to retrieve those discarded designs and, again, start building those vehicles that were once built a long time ago?
About the Author:
Are you seeking for a great deal on domain name checker or perhaps a comparable item? I found an excellent web site on managed dedicated server hosting that had fairly a couple of incredible products. You ought to definitely have a peek.
No comments:
Post a Comment